Modeling of wastewater treatment processes in membrane bioreactors compared to conventional activated sludge systems
Artykuł w czasopiśmie
MNiSW
70
Lista 2021
Status: | |
Autorzy: | Bis Marta, Montusiewicz Agnieszka, Piotrowicz Adam, Łagód Grzegorz |
Dyscypliny: | |
Aby zobaczyć szczegóły należy się zalogować. | |
Rok wydania: | 2019 |
Wersja dokumentu: | Drukowana | Elektroniczna |
Język: | angielski |
Numer czasopisma: | 5 |
Wolumen/Tom: | 7 |
Numer artykułu: | 285 |
Strony: | 1 - 11 |
Impact Factor: | 2,753 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 15 |
Scopus® Cytowania: | 21 |
Bazy: | Web of Science | Scopus |
Efekt badań statutowych | TAK |
Materiał konferencyjny: | NIE |
Publikacja OA: | TAK |
Licencja: | |
Sposób udostępnienia: | Witryna wydawcy |
Wersja tekstu: | Ostateczna wersja opublikowana |
Czas opublikowania: | W momencie opublikowania |
Data opublikowania w OA: | 14 maja 2019 |
Abstrakty: | angielski |
Membrane techniques constitute an interesting alternative to conventional activated sludge systems (CAS). In membrane bioreactors (MBR), the biomass separated on membranes is retained independently of sludge sedimentation properties. As a consequence, a high biomass concentration as well as low food to microorganisms ratio can be obtained. Moreover, the development of a characteristic activated sludge population is stimulated by the specific conditions prevailing in MBRs. In the study, the operation and treatment efficiency of the MBR and CAS processes were examined and compared. Simulation was performed with the use of GPS-X software. The effluent quality obtained for the MBR system was either better or comparable to that of CAS. The most significant difference concerned the elimination of total suspended solids, which amounted to 99.8% in the MBR. Regarding nutrients, a low concentration of total phosphorus in the effluent from CAS and MBR was obtained (0.67 gP m−3 and 0.50 gP m−3, respectively). Greater differences were achieved in the case of total nitrogen. Although almost complete nitrification took place in both systems, a lower concentration of nitrate in the effluent from MBR in comparison to CAS, i.e., 11.2 gN m−3 and 14.1 gN m−3, respectively, allowed us to obtain a higher removal of total nitrogen (80.8% and 76.1%, respectively). |