Informacja o cookies

Zgadzam się Nasza strona zapisuje niewielkie pliki tekstowe, nazywane ciasteczkami (ang. cookies) na Twoim urządzeniu w celu lepszego dostosowania treści oraz dla celów statystycznych. Możesz wyłączyć możliwość ich zapisu, zmieniając ustawienia Twojej przeglądarki. Korzystanie z naszej strony bez zmiany ustawień oznacza zgodę na przechowywanie cookies w Twoim urządzeniu.

Publikacje Pracowników Politechniki Lubelskiej
MNiSW
200
Lista 2021
Status:
Autorzy: Jamińska-Gadomska Paulina, Lipecki Tomasz, Pieńko Michał, Podgórski Jerzy
Dyscypliny:
Aby zobaczyć szczegóły należy się zalogować.
Rok wydania: 2019
Wersja dokumentu: Drukowana | Elektroniczna
Język: angielski
Wolumen/Tom: 157
Strony: 391 - 401
Web of Science® Times Cited: 8
Scopus® Cytowania: 8
Bazy: Web of Science | Scopus
Efekt badań statutowych TAK
Materiał konferencyjny: NIE
Publikacja OA: NIE
Abstrakty: angielski
This paper presents a study on wind flow in the passage between the walls of a bell tower. The bell tower, raised above the church roof, consisted of two walls with the horizontal angle between them equal to 100°. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed for 3D models of the entire church structure. Two opposite inflow wind directions, which corresponded to diverging and converging wall layouts, were used. Amplification factors of the wind velocity along the passage were calculated. Additionally, full-scale measurements were conducted using three ultrasonic anemometers and three cup anemometers placed along the horizontal centreline of the bell tower walls. The CFD results were validated with the use of in-situ data. Wind velocity amplification or reduction observed in CFD simulations and full-scale measurements were of the same order. The biggest amplification of the wind velocity behind the passage was obtained for diverging walls, whereas the biggest reduction occurred in the front of the contraction for converging walls. The influence of geometry simplification and changes in the description of the wind flow were also analysed. Considerable differences in CFD simulations results were caused by small changes in the geometry of the model rather than by changes in the terrain category, including the roughness of the terrain.