Comparative fracture properties of four fibre reinforced high performance cementitious composites
Artykuł w czasopiśmie
MNiSW
140
Lista 2021
Status: | |
Autorzy: | Smarzewski Piotr |
Dyscypliny: | |
Aby zobaczyć szczegóły należy się zalogować. | |
Rok wydania: | 2020 |
Wersja dokumentu: | Drukowana | Elektroniczna |
Język: | angielski |
Numer czasopisma: | 13 |
Wolumen/Tom: | 11 |
Numer artykułu: | 2612 |
Strony: | 1 - 16 |
Impact Factor: | 3,623 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 18 |
Scopus® Cytowania: | 23 |
Bazy: | Web of Science | Scopus | DOAJ | Google Scholar | PubMed | CAS |
Efekt badań statutowych | TAK |
Finansowanie: | This research was supported financially by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education within statutory research project no. FN15/ILT/I/2020. |
Materiał konferencyjny: | NIE |
Publikacja OA: | TAK |
Licencja: | |
Sposób udostępnienia: | Witryna wydawcy |
Wersja tekstu: | Ostateczna wersja opublikowana |
Czas opublikowania: | W momencie opublikowania |
Data opublikowania w OA: | 8 czerwca 2020 |
Abstrakty: | angielski |
This study investigates the fracture properties of high performance cementitious composites (HPCC) with four different types of fibres and with volume fraction content 3%. The four fibres are steel hooked end (S), polypropylene crimped (PP), basalt chopped (B), and glass (G) fibres. The tests were carried out in accordance with the RILEM recommendations. In order to examine the fresh properties of HPCC the slump flow tests were performed. Twelve fibre reinforced HPCC beam specimens with notch were cast and tested using central point loading experiments. In addition, experimental tests of the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength were carried out. The test results made it possible to obtain representative fracture parameters, such as the equivalent strengths, residual strengths, and fracture energy of fibre reinforced HPCC. The S fibre specimens showed the best performance in terms of workability, compressive strength, tensile splitting strength, and fracture energy at large deflection. On the other hand, G fibre specimens exhibited the best performance in terms of flexural strength, equivalent flexural strength at higher deflection, and residual flexural strength at lower deflection. In terms of equivalent flexural strength at lower deflection and residual flexural strength at higher deflection, basalt fibre specimens performed the best. On the contrary, polypropylene fibre reinforced beam specimens revealed the highest deflection capacity |