Analysis of the Statistical Comparability of the Hardness and Wear of Polymeric Materials for Orthodontic Applications
Artykuł w czasopiśmie
MNiSW
140
Lista 2021
Status: | |
Autorzy: | Domagała Ivo, Przystupa Krzysztof, Firlej Marcel, Pieniak Daniel, Gil Leszek, Borucka Anna, Naworol Ireneusz, Biedziak Barbara, Levkiv Mariana |
Dyscypliny: | |
Aby zobaczyć szczegóły należy się zalogować. | |
Rok wydania: | 2021 |
Wersja dokumentu: | Drukowana | Elektroniczna |
Język: | angielski |
Numer czasopisma: | 11 |
Wolumen/Tom: | 14 |
Numer artykułu: | 2925 |
Strony: | 1 - 25 |
Impact Factor: | 3,748 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 10 |
Scopus® Cytowania: | 10 |
Bazy: | Web of Science | Scopus |
Efekt badań statutowych | NIE |
Finansowanie: | This work was financed within the framework of the project Lublin University of Technology— Regional Excellence Initiative, funded by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (contract no. 030/RID/2018/19). |
Materiał konferencyjny: | NIE |
Publikacja OA: | TAK |
Licencja: | |
Sposób udostępnienia: | Witryna wydawcy |
Wersja tekstu: | Ostateczna wersja opublikowana |
Czas opublikowania: | W momencie opublikowania |
Data opublikowania w OA: | 28 maja 2021 |
Abstrakty: | angielski |
Background: Clinical success depends on the contact strength and wear resistance of medical devices made of polymer materials. The scientific goal resulted from the problem of using different methods of surface evaluation of materials used in the production of orthodontic appliances. The purpose of the work was an experimental comparative assessment of indentation hardness and scratch hardness and the sliding wear of four selected polymeric materials used in the manufacture of orthodontic appliances. Methods: Four commercial materials were compared. Shore hardness tests and a scratch test with a Rockwell indenter were performed. A sliding wear test was performed using the ball-on-disc method. Statistical PCA and correlation analyses were performed. Results: The results of scratch hardness measurements using a contact profilometer correlated with the Shore hardness to a greater extent than measurements made using an optical microscope. PCA showed that Shore hardness explains 45% of the total variance in all the results across the materials. Conclusions: The scratch hardness method allows for a more explicit ranking of orthodontic polymeric materials when measurements are made with a profilometer. The ranking of sliding wear resistance should be made separately. |