Influence of Cold Water Inlets and Obstacles on the Energy Efficiency of the Hot Water Production Process in a Hot Water Storage Tank
Artykuł w czasopiśmie
MNiSW
140
Lista 2021
Status: | |
Autorzy: | Malec Agnieszka, Cholewa Tomasz, Siuta-Olcha Alicja |
Dyscypliny: | |
Aby zobaczyć szczegóły należy się zalogować. | |
Rok wydania: | 2021 |
Wersja dokumentu: | Drukowana | Elektroniczna |
Język: | angielski |
Numer czasopisma: | 20 |
Wolumen/Tom: | 14 |
Numer artykułu: | 6509 |
Strony: | 1 - 26 |
Impact Factor: | 3,252 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 5 |
Scopus® Cytowania: | 3 |
Bazy: | Web of Science | Scopus |
Efekt badań statutowych | NIE |
Materiał konferencyjny: | NIE |
Publikacja OA: | TAK |
Licencja: | |
Sposób udostępnienia: | Witryna wydawcy |
Wersja tekstu: | Ostateczna wersja opublikowana |
Czas opublikowania: | W momencie opublikowania |
Data opublikowania w OA: | 11 listopada 2021 |
Abstrakty: | angielski |
Domestic hot water preparation is one of the main sources of energy consumption in households. One of the most important elements of domestic hot water (DHW) preparation installation is the storage tank. Its design can significantly affect the efficiency of the system and energy consumption for hot water preparation. This paper presents the results of an experimental study to examine seven different designs of the cold water inlet to the storage tank and the use of two types of obstacles inside this tank placed at three different heights. The number of stratification and the energy efficiency of the system for each variant were examined. Additionally, tests were carried out for different profiles of hot water consumption in order to examine the temperature changes in the DHW tank. A system with an inlet, as an elbow facing down with a single plate, turned out to be the most advantageous variant (3–8% increase in energy efficiency compared to the basic inlet variant). An analogous analysis of the use of obstacles inside the tank showed that the most optimal solution is to place the partition, which allows the water flow on the sides of the tank, in its lower parts (energy efficiency higher by up to 15% compared to the variant without a partition). These solutions showed the highest energy efficiency for DHW production and the lowest energy demand for hot water heating in the tank among all analyzed variants. |