Evaluation of the performance of enclosed balconies based on temperature monitoring
Artykuł w czasopiśmie
MNiSW
40
Lista 2021
| Status: | |
| Autorzy: | Grudzińska Magdalena |
| Dyscypliny: | |
| Aby zobaczyć szczegóły należy się zalogować. | |
| Rok wydania: | 2021 |
| Wersja dokumentu: | Drukowana | Elektroniczna |
| Język: | angielski |
| Wolumen/Tom: | 2069 |
| Numer artykułu: | 012133 |
| Strony: | 1 - 9 |
| Scopus® Cytowania: | 2 |
| Bazy: | Scopus |
| Efekt badań statutowych | NIE |
| Materiał konferencyjny: | TAK |
| Nazwa konferencji: | 8th International Building Physics Conference |
| Skrócona nazwa konferencji: | IBPC 2021 |
| URL serii konferencji: | LINK |
| Termin konferencji: | 25 sierpnia 2021 do 27 sierpnia 2021 |
| Miasto konferencji: | Copenhagen |
| Państwo konferencji: | DANIA |
| Publikacja OA: | TAK |
| Licencja: | |
| Sposób udostępnienia: | Witryna wydawcy |
| Wersja tekstu: | Ostateczna wersja opublikowana |
| Czas opublikowania: | W momencie opublikowania |
| Data opublikowania w OA: | 2 grudnia 2021 |
| Abstrakty: | angielski |
| Enclosed, glazed balconies influence the energy balance of the flats thanks to the temperature rise caused by solar gains in unheated sunspaces. The potential benefits, however, may differ depending on the inhabitants’ behaviour. To evaluate these effects, internal temperature in multi-family buildings located in Zamość (a city in the eastern part of Poland) was monitored at the turn of the years 2017 and 2018. The temperature was registered with the use of iButton sensors located in flats and sunspaces. Three dwellings with the same orientation were included in the research – two with glazed balconies, differing by the area of the living space, the number of the inhabitants, and their behaviour (flats no. 1 and 2), and one with an open balcony, used for comparison (flat no. 3). Air temperature within the glazed balconies was usually higher than the external air temperature, and the sunspaces helped to reduce heat losses from the adjoining rooms by 10.7% (flat no. 1) and 26.6% (flat no. 2). The apartments also showed some differences as far as the comfort of use during summer is concerned, flat no 1 being the most prone to overheating |
