Determination of Time Domain Reflectometry Surface Sensors Sensitivity Depending on Geometry and Material Moisture
Artykuł w czasopiśmie
MNiSW
100
Lista 2021
Status: | |
Autorzy: | Suchorab Zbigniew, Malec Agnieszka, Sobczuk Henryk, Łagód Grzegorz, Gorgol Izolda, Łazuka Ewa, Brzyski Przemysław, Trník Anton |
Dyscypliny: | |
Aby zobaczyć szczegóły należy się zalogować. | |
Rok wydania: | 2022 |
Wersja dokumentu: | Drukowana | Elektroniczna |
Język: | angielski |
Numer czasopisma: | 3 |
Wolumen/Tom: | 22 |
Numer artykułu: | 735 |
Strony: | 1 - 16 |
Impact Factor: | 3,9 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 5 |
Scopus® Cytowania: | 10 |
Bazy: | Web of Science | Scopus |
Efekt badań statutowych | NIE |
Finansowanie: | This research was funded by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland and grant number RVO: 11000 |
Materiał konferencyjny: | NIE |
Publikacja OA: | TAK |
Licencja: | |
Sposób udostępnienia: | Witryna wydawcy |
Wersja tekstu: | Ostateczna wersja opublikowana |
Czas opublikowania: | W momencie opublikowania |
Data opublikowania w OA: | 16 stycznia 2022 |
Abstrakty: | angielski |
The article concerns the electric techniques of moisture detection that are based on the evaluation of the apparent permittivity of the tested medium. The main goal of the research was to evaluate the non-invasive Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) sensors’ sensitivity by measuring the span of elements and material moisture. To that aim, two non-invasive sensor designs were investigated for their sensitivity in the evaluation of the apparent permittivity value of aerated concrete. Sensors A and B were characterized by the spacing between the measuring elements equal to 30 mm and 70 mm, respectively. The tested samples differed in moisture, ranging between 0 and 0.3 cm3/cm3 volumetric water content. Within the research, it was stated that in the case of the narrower sensor (A), the range of the sensor equals about 30 mm, and in the case of the wider design (B), it equals about 50 mm. Additionally, it was stated that material moisture influences the range of sensor influence. In the case of the dry and low-saturated material, it was not possible to evaluate the range of sensor sensitivity using the adopted method, whereas the range of sensor signal influence was visible for the moist material. |