Characterization of bifacial technology Pv systems
Artykuł w czasopiśmie
MNiSW
70
Lista 2024
| Status: | |
| Autorzy: | Moreno-Buesa Sergio M., Muñoz-Cerón Emilio, Garrid Gustavo Nofuentes, Gułkowski Sławomir, de la Casa Higueras Juan, Tejero Jorge Aguilera |
| Dyscypliny: | |
| Aby zobaczyć szczegóły należy się zalogować. | |
| Rok wydania: | 2024 |
| Wersja dokumentu: | Drukowana | Elektroniczna |
| Język: | angielski |
| Numer czasopisma: | 6 |
| Wolumen/Tom: | 238 |
| Strony: | 1084 - 1098 |
| Impact Factor: | 1,2 |
| Web of Science® Times Cited: | 2 |
| Scopus® Cytowania: | 1 |
| Bazy: | Web of Science | Scopus | Google Scholar |
| Efekt badań statutowych | NIE |
| Materiał konferencyjny: | NIE |
| Publikacja OA: | NIE |
| Abstrakty: | angielski |
| Bifacial solar technology has experienced exponential growth in recent years and its trend is increasing for the coming years. Considering the advantages that it offers over monofacial technology such as its current price equivalence, the increase in performance thanks to the production of the rear face and the consecutive reduction of the LCOE, it is logical that more and more photovoltaic plants with this technology are been installed. Nowadays, there are some regulatory gaps regarding bifacial technology and, due to this growing trend, it is necessary to study, research and implement the optimal way to evaluate these systems. This article has experimented with a 3.3 kW bifacial photovoltaic system, divided into two strings with different configurations, whose monitoring system has all the instrumentation included in the IEC 61,724 standard, with the addition that it has several rear irradiance sensors arranged in different locations of the system to evaluate the variability of this parameter. After an experimental campaign of 9 months, a power estimation analysis and the calculation of the PR and PR25°C have been carried out using the different rear irradiance sensors. The variability of this parameter depending on the location of the sensor has affected the results in such a way that the RMSE committed in the power estimation has varied between 10.22% and 2.63%, while the PR and PR25°C of the system has oscillated between 0.84 for the most unfavorable case and 0.95 in the most favorable case. Assumed the great variability between performance ratios, it is necessary to establish a specific normative standard for the evaluation of Bifacial PV systems. |
