Baza Publikacji Pracowników Politechniki Lubelskiej

Status:
Autorzy:	Cieślak Krystian
Dyscypliny:
	Aby zobaczyć szczegóły należy się zalogować.
Rok wydania:	2024
Wersja dokumentu:	Elektroniczna
Język:	angielski
Numer czasopisma:	15
Wolumen/Tom:	17
Numer artykułu:	3618
Strony:	1 - 16
Impact Factor:	3,0
Web of Science® Times Cited:	0
Scopus® Cytowania:	0
Bazy:	Web of Science \| Scopus
Efekt badań statutowych	NIE
Finansowanie:	This research was supported by the statutory funds granted to the Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Poland by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education internal grant number FD-006.
Materiał konferencyjny:	NIE
Publikacja OA:	TAK
Licencja:
Sposób udostępnienia:	Witryna wydawcy
Wersja tekstu:	Ostateczna wersja opublikowana
Czas opublikowania:	W momencie opublikowania
Data opublikowania w OA:	23 lipca 2024
Abstrakty:	angielski
	The evolving legislation regarding electricity billing for both consumers and prosumers, coupled with the growing interest in photovoltaic installations with energy storage, provided the motivation to examine the operational and financial viability of a prosumer photovoltaic installation located in Poland. Two options were considered: a standard photovoltaic system without energy storage and an installation with batteries. Furthermore, four scenarios were analyzed, each reflecting a different way of accounting for the electricity bought and sold by the prosumer. Another scenario is that energy prices are influenced by a high share of renewable sources. As the changes to the billing scheme are a recent development, there is no relevant analysis currently available. In order to ensure the reliability of the analysis, PVsyst 7.4 software was employed to establish the main performance and financial parameters for the selected PV systems. Analysis showed that using an energy storage system will increase the energy self-consumption from 28.6% to 60.4%, which in some cases would have a great influence on profitability of the investment. In the worst scenario, the payback period is too long (13.7 years). But in the most favorable scenario, with additional financing, it drops to 3.9 years.

Informacja o cookies

Profitability Analysis of a Prosumer Photovoltaic Installation in Light of Changing Electricity Billing Regulations in Poland

Artykuł w czasopiśmie