Human-computer interaction in scientific journal websites: a usability and accessibility analysis of human-designed and artificial intelligence – generated user interfaces
Artykuł w czasopiśmie
MNiSW
100
Lista 2024
| Status: | |
| Autorzy: | Skolimowski Konrad , Rola Bartosz , Tokarski Piotr, Rybak Karolina, Łazaruk Karol, Plechawska-Wójcik Małgorzata, Dzieńkowski Mariusz |
| Dyscypliny: | |
| Aby zobaczyć szczegóły należy się zalogować. | |
| Rok wydania: | 2026 |
| Wersja dokumentu: | Drukowana | Elektroniczna |
| Język: | angielski |
| Numer czasopisma: | 2 |
| Wolumen/Tom: | 20 |
| Strony: | 33 - 52 |
| Scopus® Cytowania: | 0 |
| Bazy: | Scopus | BazTech |
| Efekt badań statutowych | NIE |
| Materiał konferencyjny: | NIE |
| Publikacja OA: | TAK |
| Licencja: | |
| Sposób udostępnienia: | Otwarte czasopismo |
| Wersja tekstu: | Ostateczna wersja opublikowana |
| Czas opublikowania: | W momencie opublikowania |
| Data opublikowania w OA: | 23 grudnia 2025 |
| Abstrakty: | angielski |
| The issue of usability and accessibility in scientific journals is of crucial importance for effective knowledge com- munication, with a direct impact on user satisfaction. These aspects must be considered at every stage of website development, from needs analysis and planning, through design and implementation, to testing, maintenance, and further development. In the contemporary digital landscape, a discernible trend has emerged for websites to be designed by the principles of Universal Design (UD). Furthermore, tools based on artificial intelligence (AI) are playing an increasingly significant role in their development. The present study involved the execution of two independent experiments with several people overlapping in both groups. In the first study, a comparative analy- sis was conducted between the existing website of a scientific journal and a prototype manually developed by a designer, adhering to the UD principles. In the second experiment, the existing website was compared with two prototypes generated by different AI-based tools. The evaluation of usability, accessibility, and user satisfaction was conducted utilising a combination of methodologies, including the eye-tracking technique, an author survey, and automated tools designed to assess compliance with WCAG 2.1 AA guidelines. |
