A comparative framework for formal representation strategies in sign language avatar systems
Artykuł w czasopiśmie
MNiSW
20
Lista 2024
| Status: | |
| Autorzy: | Amangeldy Nurzada, Yerimbetova Aigerim, Miłosz Marek, Kassymova Akmaral, Daiyrbayeva Elmira, Tursynova Nazira |
| Dyscypliny: | |
| Aby zobaczyć szczegóły należy się zalogować. | |
| Rok wydania: | 2026 |
| Wersja dokumentu: | Elektroniczna |
| Język: | angielski |
| Numer czasopisma: | 5 |
| Wolumen/Tom: | 14 |
| Numer artykułu: | 303 |
| Strony: | 1 - 20 |
| Impact Factor: | 3,6 |
| Web of Science® Times Cited: | 0 |
| Bazy: | Web of Science |
| Efekt badań statutowych | NIE |
| Materiał konferencyjny: | NIE |
| Publikacja OA: | TAK |
| Licencja: | |
| Sposób udostępnienia: | Witryna wydawcy |
| Wersja tekstu: | Ostateczna wersja opublikowana |
| Czas opublikowania: | W momencie opublikowania |
| Data opublikowania w OA: | 14 maja 2026 |
| Abstrakty: | angielski |
| This paper proposes a unified methodological framework for evaluating heterogeneous approaches to avatar-based sign language visualization. The study introduces a four-dimensional analytical framework based on four independent criteria: (A1) pipeline architecture and degree of automation, (A2) data and annotation requirements, (A3) portability across sign languages and domains, and (A4) integration and accessibility. The framework is applied to a comparative analysis of three dominant paradigms: (P1) notation → animation (e.g., HamNoSys), (P2) writing-based representation → animation (e.g., SignWriting), and (P3) keypoint-based animation and Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods. The comparative assessment shows that the differences between the paradigms are structural and reflect trade-offs among linguistic accuracy, automation level, scalability, and user accessibility, rather than the superiority of any one technology. Overall, the structured comparative framework (A1–A4) is applied for analyzing three paradigms of sign language avatar generation. It enables a systematic evaluation of architectural, data-related, and practical characteristics, highlighting key trade-offs between linguistic accuracy, scalability, and accessibility. |
