Mobile Apps for Students: Usability Without Barriers?
Fragment książki (Materiały konferencyjne)
MNiSW
20
konferencja
| Status: | |
| Autorzy: | Tokarski Piotr, Łazaruk Karol, Plechawska-Wójcik Małgorzata, Podgórski Jakub, Posikata Jakub, Dzieńkowski Mariusz |
| Dyscypliny: | |
| Aby zobaczyć szczegóły należy się zalogować. | |
| Wersja dokumentu: | Elektroniczna |
| Język: | angielski |
| Strony: | 54 - 60 |
| Efekt badań statutowych | NIE |
| Materiał konferencyjny: | TAK |
| Nazwa konferencji: | The Nineteenth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions |
| Skrócona nazwa konferencji: | ACHI 2026 |
| URL serii konferencji: | LINK |
| Termin konferencji: | 24 maja 2026 do 28 maja 2026 |
| Miasto konferencji: | Venice |
| Państwo konferencji: | WŁOCHY |
| Publikacja OA: | TAK |
| Licencja: | |
| Sposób udostępnienia: | Inne |
| Wersja tekstu: | Ostateczna wersja opublikowana |
| Czas opublikowania: | W momencie opublikowania |
| Data opublikowania w OA: | 28 maja 2026 |
| Abstrakty: | angielski |
| The aim of the paper is to evaluate the usability and accessibility of three mobile apps designed for university students, including those with various types of disabilities. The following apps from Polish universities were selected for analysis: Kampus Pollub, PW Navi, and SmartUMED. The study employed multiple methods to assess usability, including eye-tracking technology, the System Usability Scale (SUS), the User Version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS), and an automated accessibility evaluation tool. The study was conducted with a group of 30 participants. The results indicate that contemporary mobile apps intended for students generally achieve a satisfactory level of usability, although variability in user evaluations was observed. Significant differences were found between objective and subjective quality assessments within the uMARS questionnaire, with users rating objective aspects more favorably than their overall subjective experience. Furthermore, no statistically significant relationship was identified between SUS scores and uMARS ratings, suggesting that usability and perceived app quality represent distinct dimensions of user experience. Eye-tracking analysis revealed trends indicating higher visual effort for less usable interfaces; however, these differences were not statistically significant. |
