![](/static/ps_publications/img/article-icon.png)
Short-term influence of two types of drilling fluids on wastewater treatment rate and eukaryotic organisms of activated sludge in sequencing batch reactors
Artykuł w czasopiśmie
MNiSW
30
Lista A
Status: | |
Autorzy: | Babko Roman, Jaromin-Gleń Katarzyna, Łagód Grzegorz, Danko Yaroslav, Kuzmina Tatyana, Pawłowska Małgorzata, Pawłowski Artur |
Dyscypliny: | |
Aby zobaczyć szczegóły należy się zalogować. | |
Rok wydania: | 2017 |
Wersja dokumentu: | Drukowana | Elektroniczna |
Język: | angielski |
Numer czasopisma: | 4 |
Wolumen/Tom: | 46 |
Strony: | 714 - 721 |
Impact Factor: | 2,405 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 1 |
Scopus® Cytowania: | 4 |
Bazy: | Web of Science | Scopus | Web of Science Core Collection |
Efekt badań statutowych | NIE |
Materiał konferencyjny: | NIE |
Publikacja OA: | NIE |
Abstrakty: | angielski |
This work presents the results of studies on the impact of spent drilling fluids cotreated with municipal wastewater on the rate of the wastewater treatment process and the structure of the community of eukaryotic organisms inhabiting an activated sludge. The studies were conducted under laboratory conditions in sequencing batch reactors. The effect of added polymer-potassium drilling fluid (DF1) and polymer drilling fluid (DF2) at dosages of 1 and 3% of wastewater volume on the rate of removal of total suspended solids, turbidity, chemical oxygen demand, and the content of total and ammonium nitrogen were analyzed, taking into account the values of these parameters measured at the end of each operating cycle. In addition to the impacts on the aforementioned physicochemical indices, the influence of drilling fluid on the biomass of various groups of eukaryotes in activated sludge was analyzed. The impact of the drilling fluid was highly dependent on its type and dosage. A noticeable slowdown in the rate of the wastewater treatment process and a negative effect on the organisms were observed after the addition of DF2. This effect intensified after an increase in fluid dose. However, no statistically significant negative changes were observed after the introduction of DF1. Conversely, the removal rate of some of the analyzed pollutant increased. |